家庭法律问题律师信函

[Law Firm Letterhead] [Address] [Telephone] | [Email]

[Date]

VIA EMAIL AND COURIER

Attorney Liu [Law Firm/Agency Name] [Address]

Re: Formal Demand to Correct Civil Affairs Registration Error for an Indigent Party and Proposal for Interim Biweekly Visitation Arrangement

Dear Attorney Liu:

We represent [Client Name Redacted for Privacy] in a family-law matter involving (i) the correction of an error in a civil affairs registration record and (ii) the establishment of an interim visitation schedule in the best interests of the minor child. Given our client’s indigent status and the ongoing prejudice arising from both the registration error and the interruption of parent-child contact, we write to set out our client’s position, the applicable legal framework, and a concrete proposal for timely, pragmatic resolution.

I. Demand to Correct Civil Affairs Registration Error

1. Factual posture. Our client’s civil affairs registration record contains an obvious error material to familial status and the exercise of lawful rights, including—but not limited to—family-related benefits and the administration of custody/visitation arrangements. We are prepared to provide competent, contemporaneous documentary proof (government-issued identification, household registration, prior certificates/records, and corroborating materials) that demonstrates the error and the correct entry.

2. Governing law and administrative duty. Under the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (Book IV: Marriage and Family) and the State Council’s Marriage Registration Regulations (as amended), marriage and family registrations must be accurate, complete, and promptly rectified when clerical or factual mistakes are shown by reliable documentation. Where an error originates from administrative handling, the registration authority has the duty to correct ex officio or upon application and to reissue the corrected certificate or update the registration record. Refusal to correct a demonstrated error is subject to administrative reconsideration and, if necessary, administrative litigation pursuant to the Administrative Reconsideration Law and the Administrative Procedure Law. In performing these duties, authorities must act in accordance with the principles of lawfulness, proportionality, and procedural fairness.

3. Indigency and fee waivers. Our client meets the statutory criteria for legal aid and fee relief. In a correction arising from administrative error, and in light of indigency, the registration authority should waive any discretionary fees and facilitate an expedited appointment. We will furnish supporting income and hardship documentation upon request.

4. Demand. Please confirm, within five business days of receipt, that your client (a) will accept the correction application supported by the enclosed proofs, (b) will process a clerical rectification and issue an updated record/certificate within ten business days thereafter, and (c) will waive or refrain from charging discretionary fees in light of administrative fault and our client’s hardship. If your client believes the matter requires a formal written administrative decision, kindly issue it forthwith to preserve our client’s right to timely reconsideration or judicial review.

II. Proposal for Interim Biweekly Visitation

1. Legal framework. Under the Civil Code (Marriage and Family), a non-residential parent retains the right to reasonably visit and maintain contact with their minor child, and no person may unlawfully obstruct such contact. Visitation may be adjusted, suspended, or restored by agreement or by court order only when necessary to protect the minor’s physical and mental well-being and overall best interests. Supreme People’s Court guidance on family adjudication emphasizes preserving the child’s stable bonds with both parents and encourages timely, flexible interim arrangements pending final determination.

2. Temporary arrangement. Without prejudice to any party’s claims or defenses on final custody/parental responsibility, we propose the following interim visitation plan, to begin immediately:

• Frequency: Every other week (biweekly), commencing on [next Saturday date].
• Time: Saturdays 10:00–18:00 (eight hours), with reasonable flexibility for the child’s schooling and activities.
• Exchanges: Neutral, public location near the child’s residence, e.g., the main entrance of [Landmark/Community Center], with punctual handoffs at 10:00 and 18:00.
• Supervision: Unsupervised contact, absent specific and documented safety concerns. If supervision is insisted upon, we propose a time-limited, least-restrictive measure for three consecutive visits, supervised by a mutually acceptable adult relative, to be revisited thereafter.
• Communication: One midweek video/voice call of up to 15 minutes on Wednesdays between 19:00–20:00, coordinated in advance, not to interfere with homework or bedtime.
• Health/safety: Both parties will ensure the child’s safety (including age-appropriate car restraints), sobriety, and a non-disparagement environment. No corporal punishment. The visiting parent will follow any existing medical, dietary, or educational routines.
• Holidays/transport: Absent further agreement, regular alternation continues; transportation is shared, with each party responsible for one direction per visit.
• Non-interference: Neither party shall impede exchanges, withhold essential documents/clothing, or schedule conflicting activities without reasonable notice and accommodation.

3. Rationale and enforceability. The proposed schedule is minimally intrusive, child-centered, and in line with the best-interests standard. If we cannot reach consensus within seven calendar days, we will petition the people’s court for a visitation order and necessary interim relief. Continued obstruction may be addressed through behavior-preservation measures and, after an order is entered, enforcement remedies available under the Civil Procedure Law.

III. Preservation, Cooperation, and Next Steps

• Documents. We can transmit, on a confidential basis, the identification, household, and prior registration materials that substantiate the registration error. Please confirm the proper recipient and preferred format for secure delivery.
• Timelines. Kindly (i) confirm acceptance and timing for the registration correction within five business days; and (ii) provide written assent or a good-faith counterproposal on interim visitation within seven calendar days.
• Points of contact. To avoid misunderstandings and minimize friction, please direct all communications to undersigned counsel. We remain available to coordinate an expedited appointment with the registration authority and to finalize a simple written visitation protocol for signature.

Our client seeks a practical, lawful, and prompt resolution. We trust your client shares these objectives. Should you require additional authority or wish to propose reasonable variations to the schedule that better accommodate the child, we will consider them in good faith.

Nothing herein waives any right, claim, or remedy. All rights are reserved.

Sincerely,

[Attorney Name] Attorney at Law [Law Firm Name] Counsel for [Client Name Redacted]

Enclosures (by reference; to be transmitted upon confirmation of secure delivery):

• Identification documents and household registration extracts
• Existing civil affairs registration record and evidence of error
• Indigency and legal aid documentation
• Proposed interim visitation protocol (draft)

致：王律师 抄送：贵所项目组（如适用）

主题：就贵我双方委托人之婚姻家庭争议事项的会前中立沟通函（列明争点、可执行建议、时间表与保密条款）

王律师台鉴：

本人受我方委托人之正式授权，作为其家事法律顾问，就贵我双方拟于近期举行的会前沟通与协商，谨以本函中立、专业地明确争点范围，提出可执行的程序与实质性建议，并就时间表及会前保密规则供贵方审阅、确认。为避免误解，本函与后续会谈均以协助当事人理性、有效解决争议、优先保护未成年人最佳利益为宗旨，不涉对实体权利的放弃或事实承认。

一、程序与法律框架提示

• 适用法律与原则：本案以中华人民共和国民法典（婚姻家庭编）确立的婚姻自由、夫妻平等、未成年人最佳利益、保护妇女未成年人老年人合法权益等基本原则为指导；同时参照最高人民法院有关适用民法典婚姻家庭编的司法解释、关于夫妻债务的司法解释、民事诉讼证据规则、反家庭暴力法、未成年人保护法及个人信息保护法等相关规范。
• 程序取向：优先考虑协商与调解（含法院诉前调解、专业家事调解或协作式离婚），在必要时配合采取证据/财产/行为保全，以确保争议解决的公平与可执行性。

二、拟定争点目录（供会前确认与补充）

1. 离婚方式与程序
   • 是否以民政部门登记途径办理，抑或诉讼离婚；如诉讼，是否先行就子女与临时安置达成合意以缩小争议。
2. 未成年子女抚养安排
   • 监护与日常居住：确定日常居住方、共同监护的决策分工、教育与医疗重大事项的协商机制。
   • 探视与联系：常规探视（工作日/周末/寒暑假/法定节假日）与临时探视安排，视频与电话联系规则，接送地点与迟延处理。
   • 专业评估：如有必要，委托社会调查、心理评估或家事调查，以落实“最有利于未成年人原则”。
3. 抚养费与教育医疗费用
   • 抚养费基数、比例与支付方式（按月或一次性），调整机制（结合子女实际需要、父母负担能力、当地生活水平），教育与重大医疗费用的分担与报销流程，逾期支付的违约与强制执行安排。
4. 夫妻共同财产范围与评估
   • 财产范围与基准日：明确共同财产认定的时间区间与估值基准日；列明不动产、车辆、银行存款、理财/基金、保险现金价值、股权/合伙份额、知识产权收益、应收股息/年终奖、网络虚拟财产等。
   • 估值与分割：确定第三方评估机构或评估方法，分割比例与方式（实物分割、折价补偿、以股代现等），税费与过户安排，居住利益或过渡性居住权的设置。
   • 真实披露与救济：对隐匿、转移、毁损共同财产的举证与处理规则（少分、不分、返还及损失赔偿）。
5. 夫妻共同债务与个人债务区分
   • 认定标准：结合债务形成时间、用途是否用于共同生活或共同生产经营、是否具有共同意思表示（遵循“共债共签”及相关司法解释精神），审查债权人善意与交易对价。
   • 清偿安排：清单式列明债权债务、举证义务分配、利息计算与清偿顺序，防范虚假债务与循环举债。
6. 过错与救济（如适用）
   • 若涉及家庭暴力、重婚、与他人同居等法定情形，讨论是否提出离婚损害赔偿或人身安全保护令等救济。
7. 临时性措施（保全与秩序维护）
   • 临时抚养与探视、临时费用分担、临时居所与财物使用，及为维持现状所需的行为边界；必要时申请证据保全、财产保全或行为保全。
8. 协议文本与争议解决条款
   • 协议结构、履行保障（公证赋强或司法确认）、违约责任、后续争议的调解/仲裁/诉讼路径。

三、可执行的会前与会中建议

• 信息披露与证据交换
  1. 互换“资产与负债披露清单”（含不动产权属、银行流水/对账单、工资与纳税凭证、社保公积金、投资与保险、企业股权及章程/财务报表、车辆登记、负债明细与合同等）；提供期间为过去24个月，特殊资产可延伸至更长期间。
  2. 双方各指定一名对接律师统一收发材料，采用加密方式传输，并以目录化方式标注来源与时间跨度，保证完整性与可核验性。
• 估值与专项安排
  1. 就复杂资产（如股权、企业商誉、限制性股票、私募份额）共同委任独立评估机构，费用按约定比例暂付，待最终结算在财产分割中调整。
  2. 对学区房或唯一居所设定过渡性居住安排与期限，并明确水电物管等费用承担。
• 子女事项的先行落地
  1. 试行育儿计划四至六周：明确接送时段、学校沟通、医疗紧急联络人、课外活动安排、节假日轮换机制与冲突解决流程。
  2. 设置共同决策清单（教育升学、重大医疗、出境）、日常决策清单（作息、日常花销），并建立每周一次的家长沟通机制（书面纪要）。
• 程序与风险管理
  1. 如存在资产流失或人身安全风险，保留随时申请保全与保护令的权利。
  2. 对外统一沟通口径，避免相互指责或信息扩散，特别注意儿童隐私与个人敏感信息的保护。

四、建议时间表（自本函送达之日起计）

• 第1—5个工作日：贵方确认争点目录与会前保密条款；双方指定对接律师与通讯方式。
• 第6—15个工作日：首次互换披露清单及关键证明文件；就评估机构候选名单与估值基准日达成一致；提交试行育儿计划草案。
• 第16—25个工作日：召开第一次会谈（建议3小时），议题：子女事项优先+资产范围与估值方法；会后一周内形成会议纪要并确认无误。
• 第26—40个工作日：完成重点资产初步评估；就抚养费区间、探视日程与临时居住方案形成书面共识。
• 第41—55个工作日：召开第二次会谈（建议3小时），议题：财产与债务分割方案、税费承担与过户时间表；同步启动协议文本起草。
• 第56—70个工作日：完成《离婚/分家协议（草案）》或《家事调解协议（草案）》第三稿；选择公证赋强或司法确认路径。
• 第71日后：办理登记离婚或提交流程性诉讼（如协商未果），并保留在诉讼中请求证据/财产/行为保全之权利。 如贵方有客观困难，请于3个工作日内提出书面重新排期建议。

五、会前保密与“非用于诉讼”条款（草案，供确认）

• 保密范围：双方在协商与会谈中所提供的一切资料、数据、陈述、让步与方案，仅为和解目的使用，不得向与案件无直接必要性的第三方披露；因法定强制、监管要求或法院依法调查取证需要的除外，但应尽先行告知并采取必要的去标识化与范围最小化措施。
• 非作为证据：除为执行已达成的书面和解协议或双方另有书面约定外，前述协商材料与让步陈述不应作为法院审理实体争议之证据提交。该规则与我国民事诉讼证据制度关于和解谈判材料之一般限制相一致。
• 权利保留：会谈中任何方案或数字均属磋商立场，不构成对事实或法律主张之承认、变更或放弃；任何延迟或未即时主张均不构成时效或抗辩之放弃。
• 团队边界：保密义务延伸至双方当事人、其近亲必要知情范围、各自律师团队、评估审计与调解人员；相关专业人员应履行同等保密义务。
• 个人信息与未成年人保护：涉及儿童信息与个人敏感信息的处理遵循个人信息保护法之必要性、最小够用与安全保障原则，未经书面同意不得用于协商以外之目的。
• 违约救济：违反保密义务一方应承担停止侵害、消除影响、赔偿损失等责任；必要时可申请行为保全。

六、法律依据与裁量考量（要点提示）

• 子女抚养：以“最有利于未成年人”为衡量基准，综合考量父母照料能力、稳定性、子女随同生活之连续性、就学就医实际等；探视权属法定权利，非抚养方负有抚养费给付义务，数额根据子女实际需要、父母负担能力、当地生活水平合理确定，鼓励设置动态调整条款并确保可执行性。
• 财产分割：婚姻关系存续期间所得的工资、奖金、经营收益、投资收益等一般归属夫妻共同；个人财产如婚前财产、依法归一方的赠与或继承等依法予以区分。分割时注意照顾子女与无过错方、尊重家庭分工与个体贡献，防止恶意转移与虚假负债。
• 夫妻债务：以共同生活需要或共同意思表示为认定核心，区分生产经营性举债与个人消费性举债；对外债务兼顾交易安全与家庭利益保护，防范“假债真分”。

七、会谈安排与联系人

• 建议会谈形式与议程：首次会谈建议线下/视频方式，时长约180分钟。议程：1) 保密与程序规则确认（10分钟）；2) 子女事项（60—90分钟）；3) 资产范围与估值方法（45—60分钟）；4) 时间表与任务分配（20分钟）；5) 纪要与后续节点确认（10分钟）。
• 我方联系人与送达方式：请贵方以电子邮件与加密共享盘方式同步送达；纸质材料以贵所与我所指定地址互送。

为提高效率，敬请贵方于本函送达之日起5个工作日内书面反馈：

1. 对争点目录是否同意或拟增删；
2. 对时间表是否可行；
3. 对会前保密与“非用于诉讼”条款之确认或修订意见；
4. 会谈拟定日期与参会人员名单。

本函不构成本案任何实体性让与或承诺；我方保留依法主张一切权利与救济的权利，包括但不限于申请证据/财产/行为保全及在紧急情形下请求临时措施。倘贵方不同意上述会前规则，烦请即行明确，以便双方另行选择合适的程序路径。

此致 敬礼

[律师姓名] 律师 [执业机构名称] [地址] [电话/邮箱] [日期]