¥
立即购买

Reddit原生广告文案生成器

407 浏览
34 试用
10 购买
Dec 11, 2025更新

本提示词专为Reddit平台设计,旨在生成与特定子论坛文化、讨论风格高度契合的原生广告文案。通过深度分析社区生态与用户输入,产出以讨论为导向、避免生硬推销的内容,有效激发社区参与和建设性交流,提升品牌在Reddit上的有机互动与好感度。

标题:在不稳定收入下,“10分钟微复盘”真的能降非计划支出吗?一些数据 + 想向大家请教配比和习惯设计

正文: 长期潜水r/PersonalFinance,自己在做一个面向个人/双人家庭的零基预算+行为提示的小工具,最近在整理一批早期用户的观察,想把数据摊开请教大家:哪些做法值得保留,哪些只是“伪控感”。

先说结论的雏形(样本仍在扩大,非因果):

  • 使用“结账后10分钟微复盘”提示的用户,30天内非计划性开销平均下降约13%;外卖频次从人均每周3.7次降到1.4次。对自由职业/佣金收入这类现金流波动群体,下降幅度更明显。
  • 订阅类支出加上“到期前5天二次确认”规则,比只做一次提醒,遗忘续费的案例大约少了一半。
  • 雪球 vs 雪崩:在我们的小样本里,债务额相近时,先雪球(先还小额以建立动机)后切换雪崩(按利率最优)的人,连续遵守预算的周数更长。但切换时机差异很大,和现金流稳定程度相关。

我们工具本身的思路很普通:零基预算、按目标倒推出月度配额;只读对接主流银行,本地加密,默认不启用云备份;自动分类+自定义规则(类目/商户/标签);“本月剩余天数”和超支回补提示;债务雪球/雪崩对比模拟;每周两次不打扰式微习惯提醒(比如睡前2分钟检查可变支出);支持离线与CSV导出、匿名对账快照。更像把行为“杠杆”嵌到预算流程里,而不是再做一个花哨仪表盘。

想向版友请教的几个问题(更关心方法论而非工具本身):

  1. 你们在收入不稳定的情况下,如何给“应急金、投资、可变支出”定比例?是按收入档位动态分配,还是固定底线+上限?有没有你们验证过的阈值或公式?
  2. 微习惯提醒放在哪些节点不打扰还有效?结账后10分钟算“太晚”“太早”还是刚好?有人尝试过“日终2分钟盘点”或“周二/周五双节点”吗?
  3. 雪球与雪崩在心理动机上的差异:是否值得按阶段切换?你们怎么看“先雪球建习惯,再雪崩求最优”的混合路径?切换信号怎么设更稳妥?
  4. 预算类App里最容易制造的“伪控感”是什么?比如漂亮的饼图、过细的类别、过度提醒……有哪些你踩过的坑能让我们避雷?

如果对数据口径感兴趣,我们的定义和做法(欢迎拍砖):

  • 非计划性开销:月初设定中未分配/未预留的可变支出;比较的是滚动30天的基线 vs 实验期(去除一次性大额和节假日特殊项)。
  • 行为提示遵守度:以提醒后24小时内是否完成“标记/调整/备注”为准;样本目前主要是个人+双人家庭,收入形态混合。
  • 所有对账在本地加密,默认不走云;导出的是匿名分布快照,主要用于群体对标报告(我们也会把汇总结果回贴到这条帖子,便于复现和反例讨论)。

如果有兴趣一起验证这些想法:

  • 我们准备了Reddit社区专属的高级功能3个月试用,用作“讨论素材”(无需信用卡,不自动续订),附6个常用预算模板和匿名对标报告,方便大家复现或反驳我们的小样本结论。
  • 另外愿意给前50位回帖者做一次“预算分类清单复盘”(不涉隐私,仅看类别和规则设计),并反馈具体可执行的精简建议。
  • 如版规允许,我会把体验入口放在评论区;若不合规也没关系,欢迎私信索取。若此帖不符合社区规则,请版主提示,我会调整或删除。

更想听到的是你们的真实做法、失败经验和数字证据:你会怎样设计提醒频率/节点?不稳定收入下的配比公式?什么时候从雪球切到雪崩?有哪些“看起来很有掌控感但毫无用处”的功能?感谢任何直白的批评和反例,我们会把讨论要点整理成可复用的检查清单回贴给大家。不是理财建议,只是希望把预算这件事做得更诚实、可复现、少一点噪音。

Title: [Discussion] Making sound tests actually comparable — plate thickness vs gaskets, mic standards, and a small acoustics sandbox to poke holes in our assumptions

Hey r/MechanicalKeyboards, long-time lurker, first-time poster with a disclosure: I’m part of a small team building a DIY keyboard acoustics sandbox and build planner. Not an IC/GB or sales pitch — more of a tool we’ve been using to stress-test our own biases. I’d love to hear how this aligns (or clashes) with how you all test and compare sound.

Quick story that changed how we think about “fixing hollowness”:

  • Same switch and plate material, only plate thickness changed from 1.2 mm to 1.5 mm.
  • In our recordings (same room/mic chain), the 250–450 Hz peak tightened noticeably with the thicker plate.
  • Pairing that with a thin gasket subjectively reduced the “empty case” sensation more than we expected.
  • Swapping in a silicone bottom pad did tame some top-end zing, but it masked low–mid info and made the board feel less articulate. This combo nudged us to add “material stack suggestions” in the sandbox instead of pushing any single mod in isolation.

How we’re approaching “standardized” tests (and where I’d love pushback):

  • Recording controls the tool nudges you to follow: fixed mic distance/angle, room noise check, consistent gain so peaks sit around -12 dBFS, short taps and sustained presses separated, A/B in exactly the same environment.
  • It estimates resonance from case material and cavity volume, and simulates how plate thickness, cap material, gaskets, and desk surface might shift response.
  • You can A/B and get a simple frequency plot overlay, and auto-generate a build sheet with parts list, lube approach, torque suggestions, plus the exact recording chain.

Why I’m posting here: This sub is one of the few places that consistently demands hard details: mic position, lube recipe, desk/mat, torque, and the “what didn’t work.” That culture is what we’re trying to design around. I’m hoping to collect your testing norms and edge cases we should support (or stop pretending we can model).

Open questions for the hive mind:

  1. What would you call a bare-minimum “standardized recording” that’s fair across posts? Distance/angle? Short taps vs long press? Single key vs typical typing?
  2. On hot-swap kits, how would you rank upgrade priority between plate thickness and gasket approach if the goal is reducing “hollow” without smearing the mids?
  3. Should sound tests always include two scenes: short per-key taps and a few long presses to show resonance tail? Overkill or useful?
  4. Best way to control desk variables: one neutral desk mat, or publish desk material/thickness and do two passes (raw desk vs mat) for context?

If it’s useful, here’s how we logged that 1.2 mm vs 1.5 mm run:

  • Mic: small-diaphragm condenser, 20 cm from alphas, 45° off-axis, peak around -12 dBFS
  • Room: ~32 dBA, carpeted floor, no heavy treatment
  • Board: aluminum tray, 65%, hot-swap PCB, FR4 plates (1.2 vs 1.5), thin gasket vs silicone bottom pad
  • Caps: PBT dyesub Cherry profile
  • Switches: factory unlubed for the first pass; then 205g0 on stems + 105 oil on springs for pass two
  • Torque: standoffs 0.25–0.3 N·m (consistent by hand torque driver)
  • Desk: birch veneer, 28 mm; second pass with 3 mm desk mat

If mods are okay with tool links, I’ll drop one in the comments; otherwise happy to DM a test build. It runs offline, no account needed, and can export a lightweight A/B “sound card” or static overlay image you can tack onto a post.

Reddit-only perk to fuel the discussion:

  • Anyone who replies with their testing method or a small dataset (even failed experiments) gets a month of “Pro exports” and upload access to a community sample library.
  • We’ll also take a community vote and add 5 custom switch curves into the public library with credit on the page.

I’ll hang around to answer questions, but I’m more interested in your methods:

  • What details do you always log that most posts miss?
  • Have you found a desk mat or surface combo that isolates variables without killing realism?
  • Any plate/gasket pairings that surprised you (good or bad)?
  • And for those who’ve tried thicker plates: did you hear the same 250–450 Hz tightening, or did your case material dominate?

Thanks for keeping this sub focused on real data and tradeoffs. If this feels off-topic or promotional, happy to remove — otherwise I’d love to fold your feedback into the next rev and share back what we learn.

Title: 2-hour “one pot + one sheet pan” run: anti-sog lineup, cost/macros breakdown, and a few questions for the pros here

Long-time lurker, first-time poster. I’m part of a tiny team that cooks every Sunday and has been prototyping a planning + pantry app to make the whole meal-prep loop less wastey and more reproducible. Not here to hard sell—mainly want to sanity-check a two-hour flow and learn from this sub’s anti-sog, reheat, and cost tricks. Mods, if this isn’t appropriate, happy to remove.

Quick context from our closed test (120 households):

  • People who did “plan-first, then shop, with simple inventory nudges” self-reported 18% less food waste after four weeks.
  • One parent tip we tested: layer carb on bottom, dry veg on top, keep sauce in a tiny cup, and only toss after reheating. That alone cut next-day watery greens. We added a “dress after reheat” reminder and a mini-sauce step. Curious if that aligns with your experience.

This Sunday’s 2-hour run (one pot + one sheet pan, 10 meals) Goal: high protein, good fiber, reheat-friendly, minimal dishes, some cold options.

Menu

  • Sheet pan: half lemon-garlic chicken thighs, half extra-firm tofu cubes, plus Brussels sprouts and red onion.
  • One pot: cilantro-lime brown rice + black beans (use canned beans; aromatics bloomed in the pot).
  • Cold jars: took half of the cooled rice/bean mix, added chickpeas, cucumbers, cherry tomatoes, parsley; lemon-olive oil dressing packed separately.
  • Sauce: quick yogurt-herb sauce in a bowl (no extra cooking).

Macros and cost (approx; will vary by region and portions)

  • Hot bowls (chicken + rice/beans + sprouts): about 38–42 g protein, 10–12 g fiber, ~520–600 kcal, ~$2.70/serving.
  • Cold jars (tofu + rice/beans/chickpeas + veg, dressing added at eat-time): about 22–26 g protein, 10–13 g fiber, ~470–540 kcal, also around $2.70/serving.
  • Total grocery spend was $27-ish (thighs, tofu, Brussels, onion, brown rice, canned beans + chickpeas, cukes, tomatoes, herbs, yogurt, lemons; spices/oil from pantry).

Containers and storage notes

  • 28–32 oz glass meal-prep containers for hot bowls; vent lids when cooling. Most go to the fridge for 3 days; day 4–5 portions freeze well if sauce is separate.
  • 24 oz jars for cold salads; 2–4 oz sauce cups on the side.
  • “Commute-safe” trick: keep sauce and juicy add-ins in a separate cup, pack greens high, carbs low; toss after reheating or right before eating.

The 2-hour timeline (designed to minimize washing)

  • 0:00–0:10: Preheat oven to 425°F. Whisk marinade. Cube tofu, pat dry; toss half-sheet with tofu + sprouts + onion. Toss thighs separately; parchment/foil-line the pan.
  • 0:10–0:15: Rinse brown rice. Bloom garlic, cumin, and chili in the pot with a little oil; add rice + water/broth; bring to a boil.
  • 0:15–0:50: Oven: roast sheet pan (flip once around 25 min). Pot: simmer rice; stir in rinsed black beans in the last 5–7 minutes; finish with lime + cilantro.
  • 0:30–0:40: Mix yogurt-herb sauce. Chop cucumbers/tomatoes/parsley for cold jars.
  • 0:50–1:05: Rest chicken, let tofu crisp a bit more if needed. Fluff rice/beans; spread half of it on a sheet tray to cool quickly.
  • 1:05–1:30: Portion hot bowls (carb bottom, sprouts/chicken or tofu on top). Cold jars: cooled rice/beans + chickpeas + fresh veg; dressing packed separately.
  • 1:30–1:55: Lids ajar until steam dissipates, then seal. Label day and freeze late-week hot bowls if needed. Quick wipe-down; only one pot + one sheet pan to wash.

Two tricks that helped reheat quality

  • Reheat bowls covered 90 sec, then 30 sec bursts. Add sauce after heating; squeeze of lemon perks it up.
  • For tofu, a 2-minute toaster-oven hit post-microwave brings back a bit of crust.

What I’d love to learn from r/MealPrepSunday

  1. Most anti-sog, office-lunch-friendly mains: What survives a commute and microwave with minimal texture loss for you?
  2. Two-hour “one pot + one sheet pan” scheduling: Any order-of-operations or prep station tricks that save even more dish-washing?
  3. Protein + fiber on a budget: Your reliable combos that hit both without pushing cost per serving above ~$3?
  4. Cold-prep boredom: For grain/bean salads, what “refreshers” (acid, herbs, crispy add-ins) keep day-two flavor lively without going soggy?

Why I’m asking: the app we’re building tries to mirror what this sub already values—reproducible flows and less waste—not fad-y promises. It scales recipes to headcount and macro targets, makes aisle-ordered shopping lists, scans receipts to update pantry, tags “reheat-friendly” and “commute-safe,” tracks portions to reduce waste, works offline, and generates a 2-hour Sunday schedule for the one-pot + sheet-pan style.

If it’s useful as discussion material:

  • We set up a Reddit-only board with community-style meal-prep templates. There’s a 1-month free access to the macro-scaling + receipt OCR features (no CC).
  • First 100 folks who share a photo of their weekly prep plus steps in this thread can get a personalized “timing map” for their actual menu (we’ll DM you a breakdown).

Either way, I’m here to learn. Drop your anti-sog heroes, reheating heuristics, and cost/macro wins—will try a few next Sunday and report back with timings and results.

示例详情

解决的问题

帮助品牌或个人在Reddit社区中撰写与子论坛文化和语境高度契合的广告文案,避免传统广告的生硬感,通过引导社区讨论和分享洞察,促进品牌与目标受众之间的有机互动与情感连接。

适用用户

Reddit社区内容创作者

需要创造与子论坛热度话题深度结合的品牌文案,以获得社区认可和互动,提升品牌在Reddit的影响力。

营销与广告从业者

希望快速生成高质量广告文案,在Reddit平台上以自然方式推广产品或服务,吸引精准目标用户注意。

中小企业主

缺乏专门的内容团队,希望通过自动化工具打造与社区氛围一致的内容,低成本推进社交媒体推广策略。

特征总结

轻松生成与Reddit社区高度契合的广告文案,确保内容贴合子论坛文化和用户习惯。
通过深入分析目标受众的兴趣和讨论特点,自动调整文案基调和内容风格。
设计吸引眼球的标题,结合热点话题或幽默元素,增加文案的吸引力与曝光率。
运用叙事或思想实验手法,创作生动有趣的正文内容,自然而然融入社区日常讨论。
以开放式问题引导社区用户分享观点和经验,激发活跃互动与讨论热情。
婉转植入产品或服务的核心特色,通过分享故事或独特洞察,引发用户兴趣与共鸣。
提供促进社区参与的行动号召,引导用户评论、点赞或分享经历,增加品牌曝光。
允许灵活输入专属福利、热门话题等个性化参数,定制化生成符合特定场景的文案。
帮助品牌减少冗长的手动编辑环节,快速生成高质量文案,提升工作效率。
确保文案真诚有价值,避免生硬推销,保护品牌形象并增强用户信任感。

如何使用购买的提示词模板

1. 直接在外部 Chat 应用中使用

将模板生成的提示词复制粘贴到您常用的 Chat 应用(如 ChatGPT、Claude 等),即可直接对话使用,无需额外开发。适合个人快速体验和轻量使用场景。

2. 发布为 API 接口调用

把提示词模板转化为 API,您的程序可任意修改模板参数,通过接口直接调用,轻松实现自动化与批量处理。适合开发者集成与业务系统嵌入。

3. 在 MCP Client 中配置使用

在 MCP client 中配置对应的 server 地址,让您的 AI 应用自动调用提示词模板。适合高级用户和团队协作,让提示词在不同 AI 工具间无缝衔接。

AI 提示词价格
¥25.00元
先用后买,用好了再付款,超安全!

您购买后可以获得什么

获得完整提示词模板
- 共 412 tokens
- 6 个可调节参数
{ 产品/服务信息 } { 目标子论坛名称 } { 社区文化特征与热门话题 } { 产品/服务的独特洞察或故事 } { 期望引发的讨论方向 } { 社区专属福利或激励 }
获得社区贡献内容的使用权
- 精选社区优质案例,助您快速上手提示词
使用提示词兑换券,低至 ¥ 9.9
了解兑换券 →
限时半价

不要错过!

半价获取高级提示词-优惠即将到期

17
:
23
小时
:
59
分钟
:
59