撰写法律声明书

平台维权申诉声明书

致：［电商平台名称］知识产权保护/合规部门

权利人（投诉方）：［公司/权利人名称］ 统一社会信用代码/身份证号：［填写］ 地址：［填写］ 联系人及电话/邮箱：［填写］

一、案件基本事实

1. 权利基础：我方依法享有中国境内第12345678号注册商标（下称“涉案商标”）的专用权。该商标目前处于有效状态，核定使用商品/服务类别及核定商品/服务以我方提交的《商标注册证》为准。
2. 侵权事实：贵平台店铺ID：A123（下称“涉事店铺”）未经我方授权，擅自使用涉案商标标识并在贵平台销售含涉案商标标识的商品。经我方比对，涉事店铺在商品实物、商品详情页及包装等处使用与我方注册商标相同/近似标识，构成未经许可的商标性使用，且其销售的相关商品与我方商标核定使用的商品属于相同或类似商品类别。
3. 证据线索：
   • 商标注册证：第12345678号（复印件/扫描件见附件1）
   • 比对材料：商品页面及实物标识与我方注册商标的比对图片（附件2）
   • 交易证据：在涉事店铺实际下单购买的订单号O-9876（订单信息、物流信息、商品实拍见附件3）
   • 涉嫌侵权链接清单：见附件4（如有新增，我方将持续补充） 上述证据能够初步证明涉事店铺未经许可在相同或类似商品上使用与我方注册商标相同/近似的标识，并实施了销售行为。

二、法律依据与责任主张

1. 商标权专用权及侵权构成
   • 根据《中华人民共和国商标法》关于侵权行为的规定，未经商标注册人许可，在同一种或类似商品上使用与其注册商标相同或近似的商标，属于侵犯注册商标专用权；销售侵犯注册商标专用权的商品同属侵权。涉事店铺的行为已符合上述侵权构成要件，应依法立即停止侵权、下架相关商品并承担相应法律责任。
   • 根据《商标法》及其实施条例关于“商标使用”的规定，在商品、商品包装、容器、交易凭证、广告宣传、展览、以及其他商业活动中使用商标，均属于商标性使用。涉事店铺在商品页面、实物及包装中对涉案商标的标注，属商业性使用，且无权利来源与授权链条，构成对我方商标专用权的直接侵害。
2. 平台的法定义务
   • 《中华人民共和国电子商务法》第四十二条规定：权利人认为其知识产权受到侵害的，有权通知电商平台并提供初步证据；平台接到通知后应当及时采取删除、屏蔽、断开链接、终止交易和服务等必要措施，并将通知转送平台内经营者；平台未及时采取必要措施的，与该经营者对扩大部分的损害承担连带责任。
   • 《中华人民共和国民法典》（侵权责任编）关于网络服务提供者注意义务的规定明确：网络平台接到权利人通知后未及时采取必要措施的，应就因此扩大的损害承担相应责任。
   • 《网络交易监督管理办法》（国家市场监督管理总局令）亦要求平台建立知识产权保护规则与投诉处理机制，对涉嫌侵权信息采取及时有效的止损措施，并依法留存、配合提供相关线索。 基于上述规定，贵平台在收到我方合规通知及证据后，对涉事店铺及涉案链接负有及时采取必要措施的法定义务。

三、请求事项 为制止正在发生的侵权并防止损害扩大，现依法向贵平台提出如下处理请求：

1. 立即对涉案内容采取必要措施：
   • 迅速下架、删除、屏蔽并断开与涉案商标侵权有关的商品链接及页面内容；
   • 暂停涉事店铺A123对相关商品的上新、推广、支付、发货等交易功能，防止损害扩大。
2. 对涉事店铺采取账户处置措施：
   • 依据贵平台规则及电子商务法的规定，对涉事店铺采取限权、冻结直至封禁等措施；
   • 将本次投诉转送涉事店铺，并要求其就合法来源作出书面说明。
3. 要求提供合法来源证明：
   • 请责令涉事店铺在限定期限内提交完整的合法来源/合规授权证明文件，包括但不限于：商标权利人出具的授权书或许可合同、完整且可追溯的进货凭证（增值税发票/购销合同/入库单）、报关单及检验检疫证明（涉及进口的）、供货方资质信息等；
   • 请贵平台在符合法律、平台规则及个人信息保护要求的前提下，将上述证明材料或其要点告知我方以核验真伪；逾期未提供或经核验不能证明合法来源的，请维持并扩大处置措施。
4. 依法留存与提供证据线索：
   • 请对涉案信息进行证据保全，留存并加盖平台电子签名/时间戳的页面快照、商品上下架记录、交易订单与流水（含订单号O-9876及关联订单）、评价与客服聊天记录、收发货与物流信息、涉案链接生成与变更记录、相关账号登录与IP日志等电子数据，以备监管、鉴定及诉讼使用；
   • 在法定前提与程序下，请协助提供涉事店铺经营者真实身份信息、主体登记信息、联系人及送达地址等必要线索，以便我方依法维权（包括行政投诉、证据保全及民事起诉）。
5. 反通知与后续：
   • 如涉事店铺提出反通知，请贵平台依法审查其证据；若其未能提供合法、充分、可核验的权属或来源证明，请勿恢复相关链接或服务；
   • 我方保留向市场监管部门申请行政查处、向公安机关报案（情节严重涉嫌刑事犯罪的，参见《刑法》关于假冒注册商标、销售假冒注册商标的商品之规定）、向人民法院提起民事诉讼并申请证据/行为保全等一切进一步救济的权利。

四、法律后果提示 贵平台如未在接到本通知后及时采取删除、屏蔽、断开链接、终止交易和服务等必要措施，导致损害扩大，依据《电子商务法》及《民法典》关于网络服务提供者连带责任的规定，贵平台可能就扩大部分损害承担相应法律责任。敬请依法审慎处理。

五、诚信声明 我方承诺：上述事实与证据真实、准确、完整，提交材料来源合法，并愿依照法律就投诉不实造成的损失承担相应法律责任。为尽快制止侵权、减少不必要纠纷，我方愿意配合贵平台核验与沟通。

六、附件清单 附件1：《商标注册证》（第12345678号） 附件2：比对图片（涉案商品/页面与注册商标对比） 附件3：订单号O-9876的下单、支付、物流及实拍凭证 附件4：涉案链接清单（含URL、页面截图、抓取时间） 附件5：投诉人主体资格证明与授权委托书（如适用）

请贵平台自收到本声明书及证据之时起，尽快予以处理，并在［例如：3个工作日］内书面回复处理结果及后续安排。

此致 ［电商平台名称］

权利人（投诉方）：［盖章/签字］ 日期：［年］年［月］月［日］日 联系人：［姓名与职务］ 联系电话/邮箱：［填写］

Without Prejudice Public Statement of Clarification and Correction

I. Issuer and Purpose This Statement is issued by [Name of Publisher/Channel/Company] (the “Publisher”) for the sole purpose of clarifying the factual record, correcting prior content, and mitigating any inadvertent reputational impact arising from a video published on [date] concerning [identify product/brand/model] (the “Product”).

II. Factual Background

1. The video contained assertions and evaluative commentary regarding the Product’s quality and performance. Certain statements were based on data and materials from 2021.
2. Because those data were not current at the time of publication, viewers could reasonably have inferred that the Product’s present quality was as reflected in the 2021 information, which may no longer have been accurate.

III. Correction and Update

1. As of [date], we have obtained and verified 2024 testing results and/or certifications regarding the Product from [identify source, e.g., independent laboratory/regulatory authority/manufacturer disclosure] (the “2024 Results”).
2. We have amended the video and its description to accurately reflect the 2024 Results and have included conspicuous citations to the source(s), testing date(s), and methodology(ies), together with a time-stamped correction notice.
3. To the extent any prior phrasing could be read to assert facts inconsistent with the 2024 Results, such assertions are withdrawn and superseded by this correction.

IV. Independence, Intent, and Lack of Malice

1. The Publisher is not retained by, employed by, or in any commercial cooperation with any party having a pecuniary or competitive interest in the Product or its market. No consideration, inducement, or other benefit was offered to or received by the Publisher in connection with the video or this Statement.
2. All statements in the original video were made in good-faith reliance on then-available sources and without intent to injure reputation. Any inaccuracy or misleading implication arose inadvertently from reliance on outdated data and is hereby corrected.
3. Where the video expressed value judgments or commentary, those statements constituted opinion based on disclosed factual materials, which are now supplemented and updated with the 2024 Results.

V. Legal Characterization and Defenses (to the extent applicable under governing law)

1. Truth/Substantial Truth: The updated content is supported by disclosed sources and the 2024 Results. Truth or substantial truth is a complete defense to claims sounding in defamation.
2. Honest Opinion/Fair Comment: Evaluative statements are presented as opinion grounded in disclosed facts and updated disclosures. Honest opinion/fair comment is a recognized defense in many jurisdictions where the factual basis is indicated and the opinion is not made with malice.
3. Public Interest: The video concerns product quality and consumer information, matters generally recognized as being in the public interest. Good-faith publication on matters of public interest, with source disclosure and prompt correction upon verification, is protected in numerous jurisdictions.
4. Retraction/Mitigation: Prompt correction, clarification, and source citation are provided to mitigate potential harm and preserve proportionality with respect to any claim for damages predicated on the now-corrected content.
5. No Admission: This Statement is provided without admission of liability, fault, or wrongdoing, and preserves all rights, remedies, and defenses available at law and in equity.

VI. Remedial Measures Implemented

1. The video and its description have been revised to include the 2024 Results, clear citations, and a conspicuous correction notice.
2. Links to the 2024 source materials are provided. Where feasible, the prior version is archived and marked as superseded.
3. A point of contact is established for stakeholders to submit additional verified information: [contact details].
4. Internal review protocols have been updated to ensure that data currency and source-date verification are documented prior to publication.

VII. Apology We extend an unreserved apology to viewers, consumers, and the manufacturer of the Product for any confusion or adverse inference caused by our reliance on 2021 data. Our aim is accurate, fair, and current reporting. We regret any unintended impact and have taken corrective action promptly upon verification of the 2024 Results.

VIII. Reservation of Rights The Publisher reserves the right to issue further explanations, clarifications, or corrections as additional verified information becomes available, and to respond appropriately to any mischaracterizations of the Publisher’s content or intent. Nothing herein waives any rights, remedies, or defenses.

IX. Certification I, the undersigned authorized representative of the Publisher, certify that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, based on the sources cited and the 2024 Results referenced herein.

Date: [date] Place: [city, country] [Name, Title] For and on behalf of [Publisher] [Signature]

Illustrative Legal Authorities (jurisdiction-specific applicability to be confirmed)

• Truth/Substantial Truth: A complete defense to defamation in many jurisdictions (e.g., Defamation Act 2013 (England and Wales), s.2; Restatement (Second) of Torts §581A (U.S.)).
• Honest Opinion/Fair Comment: Protects opinion grounded in disclosed facts and made without malice (e.g., Defamation Act 2013, s.3 (England and Wales); WIC Radio Ltd. v. Simpson, 2008 SCC 40 (Canada); in the U.S., opinion protection is addressed under First Amendment principles and the fact–opinion distinction as discussed in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990)).
• Public Interest Defense: Good-faith publication on matters of public interest (e.g., Defamation Act 2013, s.4 (England and Wales)). In the U.S., robust protection for speech on matters of public concern includes constitutional actual malice standards for public officials/figures (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)) and, in many states, anti-SLAPP statutes.
• Retraction/Mitigation: Many jurisdictions recognize that prompt corrections mitigate damages (e.g., California Civil Code §48a; Florida Stat. §770.01; analogous retraction/notice provisions exist in other U.S. states and in various common-law frameworks).

Note: The foregoing authorities are provided as illustrative only. Specific rights, defenses, and procedural requirements depend on the governing law and forum. Please tailor this Statement to the applicable jurisdiction and consult local counsel as needed.